You can download spreadsheet templates from the Content Delivery page in Content Manager under the Templates tab. You can pre-validate the spreadsheet to avoid issues during upload. Each row in a spreadsheet represents the metadata for one asset. YouTube provides a collection of spreadsheet templates for metadata files to upload along with the media files you're delivering to YouTube. With bulk upload, you provide the metadata for all of the uploaded assets in a separate file. This tool lets you to create upload batches containing all your content files (sound recordings and videos). If you have many assets to deliver, you'll want to upload them to YouTube in bulk by using the Package Uploader, which you can find under the Content Delivery's "Validate & Upload" button. Also, the Upload page does not support uploading sound recordings, compositions, or videos you don't own worldwide you need to use one of the bulk methods to upload these types of assets. The down side is that there's no batch processing, nor any integration with any content management system. It doesn't require any special technical expertise, and the uploaded videos appear on YouTube right away. This option is ideal for partners who upload a few videos at a time. You don't have a separate metadata file with this method you enter the metadata manually after uploading the video. The simplest method for uploading a video and its metadata is the Upload page. Correctly choosing your ingestion method can save you valuable time. The delivery method you choose should depend on the type and amount of content you have, as well as the technical resources available to you. YouTube offers multiple ways to upload content. Hypothesis or from the horse's mouth, because I do not think you are correct (at least in a categorical way).The features described in this article are available only to partners who use YouTube's Content Manager to manage their copyrighted content. He was actually the first to do this with Gibsons (Stratosphere started the biz model but exclusively with Fenders - makes sense since the necks come off for easier shipping, but I question the lack of PR thought that went into a name that implies you are overpriced P ). Sometimes some listings seem almost worth it been tempted. For just a bit more you can get a vintage body/neck from him (also new prod). And add in even more instruments and other audio sources via dedicated ToneMatch port - one cable provides both power and digital audio between the system and. Select between optimized system EQ presets for live music, recorded music, and more. Sure a few folks might be bothered, but it IS a Gibson and it would fetch no less than a Gibson with whatever equivalent mods no matter the source. Illuminated rotary encoders give you instant access to volume, tone, and reverb settings per channel. If you want a mostly stock LP, as echoed by all above look used first. Even then, if you get each part from a diff guy it can be really expensive. It's only a good idea if what you want is significantly different than stock - like all the hardware different a config you can't get. Also Gibson would sue somebody to make it stop (the clincher right there P). If there were lots of returned but otherwise new Gibsons and Fenders available there'd be more people in this biz methinks (see, like that - just add 1 word). I'm sure they grab any grey market pieces they can (I've seen Gibsondependable list some items as seconds or defect but those, IIRC, were older vs new production, and I've seen him part our a sp ed non-rev Firebird bronze when GC or whatever was blowing them out online for US$800 new because they weren't selling) and sure, online retailers would be reselling returns - we've all seen that (as individual or small qty discount items), but unless you know that's where it all comes from somehow, it is more honest and very easy to ad a qualifier that this is your opinion or guess. Click to expand.A) You just admitted it is conjecture on your part but you presented it as fact, B) the volume is much too high/consistent and these sellers also part out vintage instruments which cannot be acquired that way, C) as you yourself stated, Gibson's current policy is to destroy vs sell seconds, D) the prices do not reflect that they are getting any sort of deal but rather buying new, at least some/most of the time (yes they could just be maximising profits, but I doubt it because they would sell more units more quickly is they were just 10% lower more quicker profit), E) quite sure I read some statement from one of these 2 guys somewhere that that is what they do (buy new unless vintage) sure they could have been lying.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |